” In using the term freedom as applied to human beings, we think only of freedom within society. Yet, today, social freedoms are considered by many people to be independent of one another. Those who call themselves “liberals” today are asking for policies which are precisely the opposite of those policies which the liberals of the 19th century advocated in their liberal programs. The so-called liberals of today have the very popular idea that freedom of speech, of thought of the press, freedom of religion, freedom from imprisonment without trial — that all these freedoms can be preserved in the absence of what is called economic freedom. They do not realize that, in a system where there is no market, where the government directs everything, all those other freedoms are illusory, even if they are made into laws and written up in constitutions.
Let us take one freedom, the freedom of the press. If the government owns all the printing presses, it will determine what is to be printed and what is not to be printed. And if the government owns all the printing presses and determines what shall or shall not be printed, then the possibility of printing any kind of opposing arguments against the ideas of the government becomes practically nonexistent. Freedom of the press disappears. And it is the same with all the other freedoms. “
Excerpted From A Lecture He Gave In Buenos Aires In 1958 . Worth Every Minute Of Your Time .
- Must “crush” press freedom if it doesn’t help poor, says Katju (thehindu.com)
- The Original Meaning of “the Freedom of the Press” and Non-Political Speech (volokh.com)
- It Is The Soldier (newsbird2.wordpress.com)
- UK’s Version of Freedom of Religion Should Scare You (independentsentinel.com)
- The new dark age: Dictatorship on the Press – Greece 2012 (insomniacs2.wordpress.com)