GOP Should Subpoena Benghazi’s Silenced Witnesses
” Benghazi: The House GOP has threatened to subpoena the survivors of the Benghazi terrorist attack, those who know the truth, and hold up the? nomination of our murdered ambassador’s replacement. It should do both.
The Obama administration is fond of using a familiar tactic, the shield of an “ongoing investigation,” to cover up its malfeasance in the deaths of Americans serving their country.
It was used to hide the truth regarding the administration’s Fast and Furious gun-running operation to Mexican drug cartels, which resulted in the deaths of agents Brian Terry and Jaime Zapata. They are using it again concerning Benghazi.
The only American witnesses to the Benghazi attack who have been named by the Obama administration are the four whom the terrorists killed in the Sept. 11 attack on our Benghazi mission — Ambassador Chris Stevens, State Department Information Management Officer Sean Smith, and former Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, who were working for the CIA.”
During what is termed, “An Active and Ongoing Investigation”, it is prudent not to divulge anything that may hinder apprehension of perpetrators of a crime. At this juncture, it becomes apparent that all they players in that attack are in fact known, though possibly in a flight mode. It is my belief, that everything was known to investigators within twenty-four hours after their arrival at that scene due to the nature of the attack, despite the US government not having the resources to “squash” an area as when cop killers are sought, the investigators are usually given support by the host governments. By continuing to veil the incident only leads to possibilities, and I hope that I am mistaken, that the perpetrators were all known to the US government, prior to the incident or possibly aided and abetted by US taxpayer dollars. For Hillary to bail out as rapidly as she did, maybe to protect interests of a 2016 presidential run, really made the event look highly suspicious, and now the ongoing circus act of the White House, only strengthens the idea of something being terribly wrong and leading straight to the Oval Office. In particular, the CIA should have some detailed answers and Mr. Brennan, never was the sort of man to say, “Don’t blame me…”
The whole thing just stinks to high heaven . Answers are required . Heads need to roll . Immediately .
A week after the attack, I posed the question on a writers’ site — Is Benghazi Obama’s Watergate?
It has a distinct feeling like it did with Nixon in 1972. Something has happened. Maybe it’s not important, but it should be investigated. The administration doesn’t want it investigated, which says it’s important. It’s too bad there don’t seem to be any journalists left to investigate it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHHzz5xhz5A
Cover-up is the word here , that and stonewall , two words very reminiscent of the Nixon era … The other words that leap to mind from the Watergate years are prosecutions and jail .