Imam Refuses To Back Texas Bill Upholding American Law

 

 

 

 

 

 

” A Texas Muslim, an Imam, who supports Sharia Law, the brutal Islamic justice system, is refusing to back an Irving, Texas, Mayor and City Council stance of a Texas bill that American courts under American law is the only law, not Sharia, that rules the justice system in America, Creeping Sharia reported on Saturday. Irving, Texas Mayor, Beth Van Duyne accused Islamic mosque leaders of creating separate laws for Muslims and when the City Council voted last Thursday, endorsing the bill in a 5-4 vote, preventing Islamists from creating their own judicial laws, Duyne was falsely accused of targeting Muslims. The Texas State bill was penned by state Rep. Jeff Leach, (R-Plano), which would forbid state judges from using foreign law in their rulings.

  Zia Sheikh, Imam at the Islamic Center of Irving stated, “It fuels anti-Islamic hysteria. Her whole point was to rile up her supporters. … The problem is we become the whipping boys. We don’t care about the bill. It’s not going to affect us in any way, shape or form… The bottom line is the foundation of this bill is anti-Islamic.” 

  Alia Salem, who leads the radical North Texas chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has also decided to speak and stated that such laws are anti-Muslim and relates to bigotry, a false analogy made by Salem. Islamists and the radical Islamic organization, CAIR refuse to acknowledge that the American justice system and other American laws over-rule Sharia laws or any other laws that are not in line with State Constitution’s or the U.S. Constitution.”

 

We would like to know why there were 4 votes against this refusal to support Sharia in Texas … read the rest

 

 

    Below are the members of the Irving city council as described on their website and while we found a record (item 19 , page 11) of the minutes of the March 19 meeting where-in the vote for/against the application of “foreign laws” was dealt with , we could find no role call vote .

 

Meet Your Mayor and Council Members

Beth Van Duyne, Mayor (at – large)
Term of Office: 2014-2017
Phone: (972) 721-2410
Mayor Van Duyne Biography
Van Duyne picture
John C. Danish, Place 1
Term of Office: 2013-2016
Phone:  (469) 507-9207
Councilman Danish Biography
John Danish
Allan E. Meagher Place 2 (at-large)
Term of Office:  2013-2016
Phone: (972) 313-0808
Councilman Meagher Biography
Allan Meagher
Dennis Webb, Place 3
Term of Office:  2014-2017
Phone:  (214) 490-9749
Councilman Webb Biography
Councilman Dennis Webb
Joe Putnam, Place 4
Term of Office: 2012-2015
Phone:  (972) 259-2626
Councilman Putnam Biography
Councilman Joe Putnam
Oscar Ward, Place 5
Term of Office: 2014-2017
Phone: (469) 704-8479
Councilman Ward Biography
Councilman Oscar Ward
Brad M. LaMorgese, Place 6
Term of Office:  2012-2015
Phone: (214) 460-1990
Councilman LaMorgese Biography
Councilman Brad LaMorgese
Gerald Farris, Mayor Pro Tem, Place 7
Term of Office:  2013-2016
Phone:  (972) 523-0784
Councilman Farris Biography
Councilman Gerald Farris
Thomas D. Spink, Deputy Mayor Pro Tem,
Place 8 (at-large)
Term of Office: 2012-2015
Phone: (972) 554-1300
Councilman Spink Biography

Councilman Thomas D. Spink

 

   Four of these gentlemen voted against upholding the rule of law and we would like to know who . The mayor and councilmen Ward and LaMorgese sponsored the resolution so the four in favor of Sharia come from the remaining 6 .

 

Update: We found an accounting of the meeting and the vote:

 

” After heated deliberation between council members, the resolution passed 5-4: Van Duyne, LaMorgese, Ferris, Ward and Spink voted for the resolution, and Meagher, Webb, Putnam and Danish voted in opposition.”

 

   Feel free to put the contact information above to use and let these Dhimmie fools know how you feel , respectfully of course . They should be ashamed to call themselves Texans . American law , and by extension Texas law , has no room for the barbarity of Sharia .

 

 

 

 

     Ed. Note: We received notice that our use of the photo that previously accompanied this story was verboten by the photographer and so we have removed it under threat of banishment from the WordPress world . After three years and 23,000 posts we have had exactly three issues of this type . The first two photographers took the time to contact us directly and ask for further credit or removal , both of which were immediately provided . This time however , we were threatened with the loss of our WordPress account and legal action so we have deleted the photo . 

    We offer our sincerest apologies to the photographer and our readers . It is never our intention to gain credit through the hard work of others and seek only share properly accredited work with our audience and it goes without saying that should anyone have an issue with us publishing something that rightfully belongs to them all that need be done is dropping us a quick note to ask for removal/credit and it will be done .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements